<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog Relations &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog-relations.com/category/media/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog-relations.com</link>
	<description>We make blogs and Podcasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Audio Ads from Google</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/12/12/audio-ads-from-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/12/12/audio-ads-from-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/12/12/audio-ads-from-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced that it&#8217;s experimenting with audio ads through its Adsense service.  Initially it&#8217;s helping advertisers buy space on radio stations, but why not podcasts next?  There may also be an opportunity for podcasters to produce audio ads for those advertisers who don&#8217;t yet have their audio plug ready.  I would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20061211/google-radio.htm">has announced</a> that it&#8217;s experimenting with audio ads through its <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/">Adsense service.</a>  Initially it&#8217;s helping advertisers buy space on radio stations, but why not podcasts next?  There may also be an opportunity for podcasters to produce audio ads for those advertisers who don&#8217;t yet have their audio plug ready.  I would have thought selling simple endorsements  / sponsorship would be the audio equivalent of a classic Google text ad. All in all, a significant development for the commercial future of audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/12/12/audio-ads-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Engines and podcasts</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/03/10/search-engines-and-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/03/10/search-engines-and-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/03/10/search-engines-and-podcasts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Watch has an article about optimising podcasts for search engines.  It mentions something I hadn&#8217;t heard about, podscope, which uses speach recognition to listen to podcasts. 
It makes a suggestion I don&#8217;t agree with &#8211; have a seperate feed for iTunes.  Feedburner will make your feed fit iTunes or any podcatcher. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3590246">Search Engine Watch </a>has an article about optimising podcasts for search engines.  It mentions something I hadn&#8217;t heard about, podscope, which uses speach recognition to listen to podcasts. </p>
<p>It makes a suggestion I don&#8217;t agree with &#8211; have a seperate feed for iTunes.  <a href="www.feedburner.com">Feedburner</a> will make your feed fit iTunes or any podcatcher. </p>
<p>Search Engine Watch is an interesting site, so I thought I would give their podcast a try.  About halfway through the second lengthy and noisy message from sponsors I gave up.  </p>
<p>If &#8211; I mean when &#8211; Storynory matches up with a suitable sponsor that fits our brand  &#8211; we will have a short message read by our narrator &#8211; &#8220;This story is brought to you by XXX &#8211; and a one sentence slogan.&#8221;  It will be far more valuable because we will be &#8220;lending&#8221; some our our relationship with our listeners to the advertiser.  </p>
<p>The first rule of advertising &#8211; don&#8217;t bore or piss off the audience.  You are spending money to spoil your brand and the publisher&#8217;s product too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/03/10/search-engines-and-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Slides</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/02/28/google-slides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/02/28/google-slides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/02/28/google-slides/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s shares have slid 13% after the finance chief admited that revenue growth was slowing.
It seems that Google has pushed text-adds to the limit.  So what next?  Mobiles, perhaps, but I don&#8217;t see people clicking through on a little screen&#8230;.. Perhaps the restless and creative minds at Google will find a way to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s shares have slid 13% after the finance chief admited that revenue growth was slowing.</p>
<p>It seems that Google has pushed text-adds to the limit.  So what next?  Mobiles, perhaps, but I don&#8217;t see people clicking through on a little screen&#8230;.. Perhaps the restless and creative minds at Google will find a way to distribute non-intrusive sponsorship among podcasts&#8230; A big challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/02/28/google-slides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam, Spam, Spam&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/01/06/spam-spam-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/01/06/spam-spam-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/01/06/spam-spam-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has nothing to do with the great curse of the internet age.  The food company Hormel has hired PR firm Golley Slater to improve the image of its key Spam brand.  
I&#8217;m sorry Hormel.  The problem isn&#8217;t Monty Python, the association with nuisance marketing, nor anything to do with image.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has nothing to do with the great curse of the internet age.  The food company Hormel has hired PR firm Golley Slater to improve the image of its <a href="http://www.spam.com/">key Spam brand. </a> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry Hormel.  The problem isn&#8217;t Monty Python, the association with nuisance marketing, nor anything to do with image.   I can only speak for the UK, but the fact is that food here is not nearly so disgusting as it was in the 1970s when Spam was in its prime.  Surely even NHS hospital or school kitchens wouldn&#8217;t serve up spam? (on second thoughts, perhaps they might). </p>
<p>Some problems are beyond PR.  Even a blog couldn&#8217;t save spam&#8230;. Even a podcast&#8230;. Even a Wiki&#8230;. <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/">Even Steve Rubel couldn&#8217;t save spam.</a>   Just give up, please&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2006/01/06/spam-spam-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why They Are Scared</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/12/12/why-they-are-scared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/12/12/why-they-are-scared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogosphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/12/12/why-they-are-scared/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk recently about the decline of old media, and the rise of new. A quick glance at the figures published today by the Advertising Association tells you why. In real terms, ad spending in national and regional newspapers declined by 8% and 9% respectively in the latest quarter. Television was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk recently about the decline of old media, and the rise of new. A quick glance at the figures published today by the<a href="http://www.adassoc.org.uk/html/news_releases.html"> Advertising Association</a> tells you why. In real terms, ad spending in national and regional newspapers declined by 8% and 9% respectively in the latest quarter. Television was static. Online ad spending was up by 46%. On the current trends, not only has online spending already overtaken posters. It is now equal to more than half the spend on national newspapers, and a quarter of the spend on TV. How long before it overtakes newspapers? Sometime in 2007, according to the current figures. It&#8217;s hardly surprising the owners of traditional media are rattled. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/12/12/why-they-are-scared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making money from Podcasts.</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/16/making-money-from-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/16/making-money-from-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting video of Jason Calacanis of Weblogs Inc talking about  models for making money out of  podcasts.  He spends most of the 12 mintues rubbishing various business models,   especially the idea that just anyone can become the Yahoo! or Google or eBay of podcasts.   He sees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting <a href="http://www.newmediamusings.com/blog/2005/11/6_podcasting_bu.html">video of Jason Calacanis </a>of Weblogs Inc talking about  models for making money out of  podcasts.  He spends most of the 12 mintues rubbishing various business models,   especially the idea that just anyone can become the Yahoo! or Google or eBay of podcasts.   He sees huge potential in a video/audio market place, if anyone can crack it technically (he doesn&#8217;t seem to have heard that eBay have just spent $3 billion on Skype). </p>
<p>This is a subject which naturally we are interested in, having just launched our own podcast site, <a href="http://www.storynory.com">Storynory</a>.  </p>
<p>Calacanis holds forth that podcasting is a great business model if you combine it with something else, like a blog.  We definitely agree with that.   Our model depends on mums and dads coming back to the site.  That&#8217;s partly why we are writing reviews there.   </p>
<p>He also says that the money follows the talent.  The &#8220;star&#8221; holds a great deal of power, and can command a high fee with the threat of moving shows or setting up on their own (like Oprah).   I don&#8217;t think Bertie the Frog is going to up and leave our children&#8217;s site yet.   I do hope that our main story-teller, Natasha, becomes a star.  When she is too busy playing in blockbusters (or perhaps at the National Theatre), we will still have the archive of her reading Bertie&#8217;s stories.   </p>
<p>Our business model for podcasting is all about building up a classic library that should be even more valuable tomorrow than it is today.  We think it&#8217;s not worth the effort to put something out for here and now, and besides, that doesn&#8217;t play to the strength of podcasting which is that you can listen to it any time.</p>
<p>Of course we want sponsorship, but we do face some dilemmas about this.   <a href="http://beyondpr.blogspot.com/2005/11/podcasting-for-children-how-bloggers.html">Joel Cere </a>kindly called on advertisers to get in early with &#8220;non-intrusive&#8221; advertising on Storynory, and followed up with another post today that gives us hope: <a href="http://www.mommycast.com/articles/2005/11/16/big-announcement-from-mommycast">Mommycast, a podcast for mommies everywhere</a>,  has found a sponsor.  <a href="http://britcaster.com/ajpegg/blog/2005/11/storynory-podcasting-stories-for-your.html">Adrian Pegg </a>(who is one of the organisers of Podcastcon) predicts Storynory will be a major podcast revenue generator by this time next year,  (thanks Adrian, I hope you are right), but he tells me that he would want to know if there are any commercial messages in our stories before he lets his children listen to them. </p>
<p>I think we could meet that concern. We could say in each post if there is a sponsor, and who that sponsor is.  I expect the sponsor would see it as an extra plug.   But even then, we wouldn&#8217;t really want the sponsorship to get in the way of  the story.  And besides,  it&#8217;s the adult, not the child, who is going to buy the toy/book/holiday/DVD.    There&#8217;s pester power, of course&#8230;  but that&#8217;s controversial too.  The whole kids&#8217; advertising thing is very sensitive and we will have to tread carefully. </p>
<p>There are particular problems with the law in the USA.   You can&#8217;t collect data, including email addresses, from children under 13 without the VERIFIABLE consent of  the parent or guardian.  This is a big hurdle to jump.   We PROBABLY aren&#8217;t covered by US law, but we don&#8217;t want to find out the hard way, still less, put off  American sponsors and advertisers or offend American tastes.    This means we have to be careful about building up a community of  listeners, at least in the short term, until we have more resources at our disposal. </p>
<p>So we come back to two of  Jason&#8217;s revenue models.  One is the podcast+ blog + advertising.  The other is the &#8220;talent&#8221;.   We make podcasts.   If you want a good podcast, not a crap one, hire us!  </p>
<p>(An acknowledgement due to <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/15/jason-calacanis-on-podcasting-business-models/">problogger</a> where I saw the link to the video, but I see few comments on his post as yet, suggesting that there&#8217;s not a huge interest in making money out of podcasts in the problogging community).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/16/making-money-from-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feedburner adds ads</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/08/feedburner-adds-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/08/feedburner-adds-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/08/feedburner-adds-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now you can put ads in your feeds.  Feedburner has launched its RSS advertising scheme. 
Initial takers include high-profile bloggers like Jeff Jarvis&#8217; BuzzMachine, the Daily Kos and Joshua Micah Marshall&#8217;s Talking Points Memo and TPMCafe.
Google is working on a similar idea to put Adsense into feeds.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you can put ads in your feeds.  <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/advertisers;jsessionid=1000858B48EB9A9F5E60C7D055785BBB.app2">Feedburner</a> has launched its RSS advertising scheme. </p>
<p>Initial takers include high-profile bloggers like Jeff Jarvis&#8217; BuzzMachine, the Daily Kos and Joshua Micah Marshall&#8217;s Talking Points Memo and TPMCafe.</p>
<p>Google is working on a similar idea to put Adsense into feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog-relations.com/2005/11/08/feedburner-adds-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
