<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog-relations.com/about-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog-relations.com</link>
	<description>We make blogs and Podcasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:24:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Exbiblio Blog - The Story of a Startup at brightblogs</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/about-us/comment-page-1/#comment-8649</link>
		<dc:creator>Exbiblio Blog - The Story of a Startup at brightblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/wordpress/?page_id=8#comment-8649</guid>
		<description>[...] Hugh Fraser, of Blog Relations makes an interesting living by writing blogs for others. One of his clients also happens to be one of my clients&#8230; â€œExbiblio, once again, is to be commended on its openness - but on this occasion, Synapse deserves credit too. As it happens, I was planning to write an account of my visit to Synapse.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hugh Fraser, of Blog Relations makes an interesting living by writing blogs for others. One of his clients also happens to be one of my clients&#8230; â€œExbiblio, once again, is to be commended on its openness &#8211; but on this occasion, Synapse deserves credit too. As it happens, I was planning to write an account of my visit to Synapse.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR meets the WWW &#187; What are the standards for reporting blog surveys?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog-relations.com/about-us/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>PR meets the WWW &#187; What are the standards for reporting blog surveys?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog-relations.com/wordpress/?page_id=8#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] Furthermore, it&#8217;s an interesting situation: the founders of Blog Relations, the authors of the survey, are journalists. They were in the situation of having the results of their (non-journalistic) research published in the media &#8212; not accurately, I&#8217;d say. But how do they feel about it, I asked them in a comment published on their blog: Hugh, congratulations for the Blog Relations surveyâ€™s media coverage. I was wondering â€” are you OK with the fact that both The Guardian and The Times didnâ€™t report about the limitations of your survey? Arenâ€™t journalists supposed to indicate when the results of a survey canâ€™t be projected outside the small sample of respondents? Shouldnâ€™t they report the -small- number of respondents? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Furthermore, it&#8217;s an interesting situation: the founders of Blog Relations, the authors of the survey, are journalists. They were in the situation of having the results of their (non-journalistic) research published in the media &#8212; not accurately, I&#8217;d say. But how do they feel about it, I asked them in a comment published on their blog: Hugh, congratulations for the Blog Relations surveyâ€™s media coverage. I was wondering â€” are you OK with the fact that both The Guardian and The Times didnâ€™t report about the limitations of your survey? Arenâ€™t journalists supposed to indicate when the results of a survey canâ€™t be projected outside the small sample of respondents? Shouldnâ€™t they report the -small- number of respondents? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.283 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-12 03:12:17 -->
