Apple V Apple

Apple’s lawyer says that even a moron could distinguish the difference between the Beatle’s famous label, and Apple’s iTunes.

It’s not the most elegant or judicial way of putting it, but I agree.


This entry was posted on March 30th, 2006 and is filed under Best Practice, Blog Home, Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or Trackback from your own site.

 
« Google ban in Ballmer household
Mesothelioma Lawyers »
 
 

One Response to “Apple V Apple”

  1. SAMANTHA
    4. April 2006 at 22:00

    i WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE SETTLEMENT OF THE APPLE CASE FROM 1991..

Leave a Reply